Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11

bush-pockets_3387322bIt’s important to remind people that we still don’t know what happened on September 11, 2001. What is known about 9/11 is that there are many incredible facts that continue to be ignored by the government and the mainstream media. Here are fourteen.

  1. An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.
  2. The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that it could find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the crimes.
  3. One person, Shayna Steinger, issued 12 visas to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steinger issued some of the visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.
  4. Before 9/11, the nation’s leading counter-terrorism expert repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous leaks prevented Bin Laden’s capture on at least two separate occasions.
  5. Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing documents from the National Archives that had been requested by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to the documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over just as Berger was trying to steal them.
  6. The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military by saying that the military had lied many times about its response. The man who was behind several of the changing accounts was a specialist in political warfare (i.e. propaganda).
  7. Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response. NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11 Commission account is true).
  8. A third skyscraper collapsed late in the afternoon on 9/11. This was WTC 7, a 47-story building that the government’s final report says fell into its own footprint due to office fires. The building’s tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies and a company led in part by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Meetings were scheduled there to discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.
  9. News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her in the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes and then found them again, BBC’s answer to this astonishing report was that everything was just “confusing and chaotic” that day. Of course, one problem with this is that the news agencies predicted the exact building, of the many damaged in the area, that would collapse. Another big problem is that no one could have possibly predicted the collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable official account for how that happened.
  10. Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact, when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the government investigation said, “We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.” The construction of the new building, without regard for how the first one was destroyed, indicates that building construction professionals in New York City did not believe it could ever happen again.
  11. Ultimately, building construction codes were not changed as a result of the root causes cited by the National Institute for Standards and Technology for destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. This fact shows that the international building construction community does not believe that the WTC buildings were destroyed as stated in the official account.
  12. AMEC, the company that just finished rebuilding the exact spot where Flight 77 was said to hit, was put in charge of cleanup at the WTC and the Pentagon. The man who ran the company, Peter Janson, was a long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld.
  13. The response of the U.S. Secret Service to the 9/11 attacks suggests foreknowledge of the events in that the agency failed to protect the president from the obvious danger posed by terrorists.
  14. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notified the FBI of suspected 9/11 insider trading transactions. That evidence was ignored and the suspects were not even questioned by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission.

There are, of course, many more incredible facts about 9/11 that continue to be ignored by authorities and much of the media. Let’s hope that the next major terrorist attack results in legitimate reporting and unified calls for truth before fourteen years have passed.

This entry was posted in 9/11. Bookmark the permalink.

32 Responses to Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11

  1. marvinsannes says:

    2 incredible facts: 1) 220 acres of 4″ concrete reduced to powder – talcum powder sized powder. I’ve drilled and jack hammered lots of concrete and this is truly incredible. 2) 1,800 bodies fragmented into 20,000 body parts spread over 1/2 sq. mi. and 1,100 souls vanished without a trace of DNA after 3 sifting of the ruble. What could do that? I think it could be done with many extremely powerful blasts and enough heat to vaporize a human body – 1,800 human bodies.

    • Fred says:

      It was actually 6″ concrete, I thought the floors were 4″ myself for a long time then some place I read they were 6″ poured floors. You are correct though not one large section of concrete or drywall anywhere in the rubble pile. An impossibility if you believe in the pancake theory the cover up team proposed. I have devoted many hours trying to figure out, with certainty, what phenomena could possibly produce these results. Along with hurling a multiple ton piece of steel structure sideways and sticking in the building across the street, that takes a phenomenal amount of force, not present in the pancake wind from floors collapsing lie.

      • Shallel says:

        The floor pans were corrugated, 4″ and 8″ in the deeper grooves. The debris pile was glaringly deficient in everything, including steel. There was 200,000 tons of steel in the two towers that would in itself make a pile 10 or more stories high, but I saw less that a story of debris, two weeks later at the site. Most of the steel was turned to dust as well. The dust went up to 27th St, down past the Battery, east to Brooklyn, and west to NJ. As an engineer, I have no explanation for this, however, the energy necessary to pulverize steel and concrete to fine ashen dust in ten seconds is not available from fire or gravity.

        Also, it is a fact that a B767 cannot exceed 250 Knots below 10,000′, yet we are told commercial jumbos with high bypass turbofans achieved speeds 200 or more Knots higher than that, while remaining intact in the dense air at 700′ and “impacted” through dense steel structure without decelerating. It is grade school physics that Force=mass X acceleration. If the acceleration is 0, then there is no force on the building or the plane. This cannot occur in the real world, only on television.

        The official story doesn’t even get out of the gate. It is poor fiction, written by the “myth maker” Philip Zelikow, who obviously does not understand any physics or aerodynamics.

      • Shallel said in his comment
        “The debris pile was glaringly deficient in everything, including steel.”

        Yet pristine sheets of paper were jettisoned from all angles before and during the collapse. This was the first thing that caught my eye as I watched the events unfold. I still think this is a huge clue, as well as the burned out cars a few blocks away.

        If we discover and prove exactly what was used to bring down these buildings, it may expose the true culprits. Looking at these 2 unusual aspects of the collapse may shed an entirely new light on the search for the truth about 9/11.

  2. Francis Daley says:

    It was indeed a day of many anomalies and coincidences. The explanations from the government are simply no plausible and yet a rapt American audience willfully suspends its disbelief just like we were trained to do. Never forget! Hunt the Bastards down, don’t let them get away with it.

    • TheHolyCrow says:

      As Jim would say, “cold grinding grizzly bear jaws hot on their heels”. And if we don’t get them in this realm, we will be waiting for them outside the gates of Hell, with clubs and knives in hand.

  3. whaler31 says:

    All ANYONE needs to know in a nutshell, and what has it brought Americans?

    A foundation of never-ending wars, the eradication of our rights, and loss of almost all privacy. All of this based on fiction and continuing fraud.

    One day the piper shall come a calling the folks responsible, and because of the extremely difficult and enduring work of brave people like Kevin Ryan, that day feels closer all the time.

  4. elldee626 says:

    One thing that stands out in my mind about 9/11 is the pictures of President Bush continuing to read to the children in a classroom in Florida, especially the one where Andrew Card came in to tell him about the attack. His reaction should have been one of action but he continued to not only sit there and read to the children but speak with them afterward. That, to me, was most telling in that he did not feel the need to respond. Some people say it’s that he didn’t want to upset the children, but it’s not like they weren’t going to find out what happened! His indifference combined with the fact that he wasn’t taken to a safe place led me to believe early on that no one felt he was in danger.

    • wordbear says:

      Mind reader! I was a teacher during that event, and the same thing occurred to me. It would appear that the people who orchestrated 9/11 didn’t want the commander-in-chief in a position where he could take charge of a military response. But they couldn’t just make him disappear, so they put him in an elementary school classroom (in a state where his brother was governor), with the unbelievably stupid excuse that he was held hostage by the kids.

      David Blomstrom, Candidate for Washington State Governor

      • wrathofaton says:

        I never thought about it that way! Thanks for the comment, fam

      • Ann Jordan says:

        Cheyney promised Silly Bush a war but I don’t think he told him how either. you can see him nod in a sort of surprise/expectation. Remember he insisted Cheyney was there when they were interviewed! By September 12th 2016, 1140 people exposed to the dust which included asbestos lagging around the steel had lost their lives, mostly through diseases of the lungs. The owners/lessees had been told to remove the asbestos because it was dangerous, so they did.

    • brian says:

      I thought there was a quote by him, that when I saw the plane hit the building, I thought what a bad pilot. WTF?

  5. Alan says:

    The 9/11 commission report is as worthless as the Warren Commission report. The official stories are cover ups pure and simple. One day some very damaging and convulsive evidence will come to light in both matters. But those of us who experienced these tragedies will be long gone.

  6. Hugh says:

    Baby Bush is so dumb he still believes the official story regarding 9/11. He wasn’t “in” on the 9/11 operation.
    DONALD RUMSFELD was the mastermind, the evil genius of the Baby Bush Presidency. Mossad was definitely at least a collaborator in the whole Hollywood Movie played out in reality on 9/11/01

  7. A weak top part of a structure cannot ever crush the intact bottom part of same structure keeping the top in place –

  8. Nikogriego says:

    September 11, 2001 served as pretext to consolidate power, destroy civil liberties and human rights, and wage permanent wars against invented enemies for global dominance over world markets, resources, and cheap labor – at the expense of democratic freedoms and social justice.

    “Let’s take a minute to re-acquaint ourselves with the official explanation, which is not regarded as a conspiracy theory despite the fact that it comprises an amazing conspiracy. The official truth is that a handful of young Muslim Arabs who could not fly airplanes, mainly Saudi Arabians who came neither from Iraq nor from Afghanistan, outwitted not only the CIA and the FBI, but all 16 US intelligence agencies and all intelligence agencies of US allies, including Israel’s Mossad, which is believed to have penetrated every terrorist organization and which carries out assassinations of those whom Mossad marks as terrorists.

    In addition to outwitting every intelligence agency of the United States and its allies, the handful of young Saudi Arabians outwitted the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport security four times in the same hour on the same morning, air traffic control, caused the US Air Force to be unable to launch interceptor aircraft, and caused three well-built steel-structured buildings, including one not hit by an airplane, to fail suddenly in a few seconds as a result of limited structural damage and small, short-lived, low-temperature fires that burned on a few floors.

    The Saudi terrorists were even able to confound the laws of physics and cause WTC building 7 to collapse at free fall speed for several seconds, a physical impossibility in the absence of explosives used in controlled demolition.” Paul Craig Roberts

    There simply is no credible evidence to support the official story. It is a myth which has led us to endless wars, huge profits for the war industry, curtailing of our civil liberties, NSA spying, the Patriot Act, and many, many needless deaths of US soldiers, Afghans, and Iraqis.

  9. zerojr says:

    Since live coverage I have’nt heard or read anything about the fact that at the same time all planes were grounded only o.b.ladens private jets were allowed to fly.

  10. Joe says:

    The tenor of your last line is unclear, though I don’t know you to be a sarcastic writer…

    Regardless, I do not believe the odds for another major attack are high – at least not in the short term, 1-5 years. The reason I do not is because the current paradigm is working A-OK. There is no need to grease the valve to open the spigot when parties concerned already bath in Niagara. The power, money, freedom to operate, public support, etc all remain strong. And thanks to fear of isis… support now grows once again.

    Additionally, given the enormous resourses organized and deployed for intelligence, it seems unlikely a splinter group with actual competence, and under marginal external governance, could successfully plan and execute a major attack on their own free will and not be seen by The Radar. Any organized group is riddled with termites and tapped ad infinitum by.eyes in the sky. I just don’t believe any Islamist militant group exists on this planet with both the intention and capability to execute a major attack, and do so undiscovered.

    Perhaps I am misreading the needs of certain people. But it seems to me like the machine is running very nicely. So there is no need for a tuneup. If it were to happen, I suppose 6-24 months into a new administration constitutes the most likely window.

  11. ajlucientes says:

    Additional Incredible Facts About the 911/anthrax Attacks:
    (note:Although the information herein addresses the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7,, we should not forget the anthrax attacks were part of the same series of attacks. Most certainly obviously carried out by the same individuals. Graeme MacQueen’s recent book ‘The 2001 Anthrax Deception’ is highly recommended.

    – Fires burned deep underground and could not be put out for over 3 months. 100 days to be precise. They were finally extinguished on December 19th 2001. While they burned, surface temperature readings as high as 2800f were recorded. ASSE trade publication: []. There are also thermal mages taken by NASA and satellite that show levels of heat, days and weeks later, which would not be possible for any uncontrolled hydrocarbon fire to produce.

    – The molten microsphere’s documented by numerous sources including the USGS & RJ Lee were so prevalent (nearly 6% by vol.) that RJ Lee labelled them a ‘signature component of WTC dust. They are not simply iron, but elemental iron that also contain traces of iron, aluminum, sulfur, and oxygen. A forensic match for a certain types of military grade thermite known as thermate.

    – Evaporated structural steel documented in FEMA’s Building Performance Study (BPAT) Appendix C : A Limited Metallurgical Examination’ issued May 2002. [] According to Dr Steven E Jones, it was the only peer-reviewed section of the entire paper. Other samples analyzed showed a ‘Swiss cheese’ appearance.’ The report states: ‘ ‘Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel…’ ‘The thinning of the steel occurred by a high-temperature corrosion due to a combination of oxidation and sulfidation. (i.e. thermite) Heating of the steel into a hot corrosive environment …that liquefied the steel.”
    FEMA called for further investigation of this finding, which the New York Times called “the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation” (Killough-Miller, 2002), but the NIST report, in its section headed “Learning from the Recovered Steel,” fails even to mention either evaporation or sulfidation. The lead on the paper later told the NY Times: “ and the structural damage would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures.” -Dr. Jonathan Barnett, Professor of Fire Protection Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute [Glanz. NY Times Nov. 29 2001]
    Here we have NIST’s ‘lead engineer’ John Gross covering up for mass murder and treason:

    – The destruction of lower intact portions of the towers were so explosive, (they only stood for 56 minutes -ST. and 102 mins NT, after the plane impacts), that each pulverized most of the 90,000 tons of concrete and converted all but the toughest steel elements into small fragments and fine powder. The 4′ inches of reinforced concrete, with corrugated metal decking on each side, that made up the floor slabs was the only concrete in these buildings. Even the sixty-five miles of elaborately cross-braced steel beams that made up the massive superstructures (core columns) were violently blasted apart, strewing them hundreds of feet in every direction with so much horizontal force that some were embedded into the facades of buildings hundreds of feet away.
    All, in 12-15 seconds apiece.

    – The dust covered Manhattan from river to river; in some paces 5-6 inches thick. It looked like a post-apocalyptic landscape Samples of this dust contained particles with high levels of manganese, zinc, and barium. []. “Barium is a toxic metal used in a number of industrial processes, but unlikely to be present in significant quantities in an office building. It is, however, useful as a catalyst and accelerant of aluminothermic reactions. Zinc, barium and sulfur are all common in military thermites.” []. These, along with other highly toxic materials contained in the dust, will continue to claim victims for many years to come. [].

    -The smaller debris from Ground Zero was trucked to Freshkills Landfill in Staten Island where it sorted into 3 content-based piles. It was then systematically laid out onto conveyor belts, lined with gloved-attendants whose job it was to cull out any human remains they could locate. Despite two years of intensive searching and use of advanced DNA recovery techniques, over 1100 victims remain unaccounted for to this day. Many victims were identified from small fragments, (some found blocks away from the site). 200 DNA tests matched a single individual. No one has addressed why DNA analyses have been unable to confirm the identity the nearly 9000 fragments of human remains that are ‘frozen for future analysis.’ []

    – Carbon nanotubes have also been found in the lungs of first responders.

    -The scientific paper ‘Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe’ [] documents the discovery of nano-engineered thermItic explosives found in every sample of WTC dust an independent international team of scientists tested. Despite being ignored by nearly all academic and corporate media sources, the paper’s findings remain unchallenged within the scientific peer-reviewed literature. Look it up in the NY Times search engine and you will not find a single reference to it. those who do speak out often pay a heavy price; Kevin Ryan was fired from Underwriters Laboratories for questioning a report on analysis they had done on the WTC floor assemblies. Both
    dr Steven E Jone and Dr Niels Harrit were each forced into early retirement. This, despite the fact that all three had exemplary employment records until the point they spoke the truth.

    This lies in stark contrast to someone like New Mexico demolitions expert Van Romero who ‘on the day of the attack believed the building collapses were “too methodical” to have been a result of the collisions, and that thought “there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse.” His remarks were published in the Albuquerque Journal. Ten days later the same newspaper printed a retraction, in which Romero is quoted as saying “Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail.” His assertion of the official line in the second article is not backed up by any explanation or analysis.’ [] Soon afterwards he was given a promotion [] and an award for being the school’s top lobbyist. NM was also given a $15 million grant for it’s new Anti-Terrorism Program.

    i could go on and on (*Like NIST FINALLY ADMITS FREEFALL in the implosion of WTC 7 : and what that the implications of the revelation are, but anyone looking at this data with an open and objective mind cannot escape the obvious conclusion this large body mutually supportive evidence indicates, -no matter how difficult a thing it is to imagine, much less believe such things could even be possible, we must necessarily go where the evidence leads.

    • VN Alexander says:

      This article on carbon nanoparticles says, “CNT of commercial origin, common now, would not have been present in substantial numbers in the WTC complex before the disaster in 2001. However, the high temperatures generated during the WTC disaster as a result of the combustion of fuel in the presence of carbon and metals would have been sufficient to locally generate large numbers of CNT. This scenario could have caused the generation of CNT that we have noted in the dust samples and in the lung biopsy specimens.” However I could not find where “high temperatures” were defined. How hot does it have to be to create nanoparticles. Were the temperatures sufficient. And is it actually true that the carn nanaparticles can be produced spontaneously in high numbers; no citation was offered for this claim.

    • Angie Chevallier says:

      Wonderful summary of the facts!

  12. willibeeb2011 says:

    I am reading 9/11 TEN YEARS LATER by David Ray Griffin and like most of the posts above he points out the many physical ” miracles ” that happened on the day that are all accepted by the main stream media including prominent left wing American writers eg Bill Moyers ,Robert Parry and Mathew Taibi . Oh and Noam Chomsky who ridicules , as they all do , anybody who has any doubts about 9/11 . While this is the case the 911 Truth Movement is going nowhere fast.
    It begs the question who , in a prominent position in American society will have the guts to go against the mainstream and suffer the same abuse that others have as dumb conspiracy theorists ? That is the big problem to overcome before the mass of the public will turn the tide and get a full and independent enquiry instigated . It is very similar to the JFK mystery that is still not resolved and we will probably not know the truth about 9/11 in our lifetime . Criminal hardly covers it.

    • Laura Cullen says:

      To All Truth Seekers: all anyone caring about the lost and ruined lives resulting from 9/11 really wants is the TRUTH, whatever that turns out to be. Whether done by aliens, Cheney/Bush/Rumsfeld, et all, or the 7 psycho dwarfs, what matters is uncovering the TRUTH. Anyone troubled by that search and what it may reveal can only have been part of 9/11. Search on, you honest people, The world awaits your result.

    • Nick says:

      I think people like Chomsky avoid it because they know it’s a rabbit hole, and if they really researched it and sounded credible as a famous person with a reputation, their lives could be in danger.

  13. jdseanjd says:

    PNAC. 9/11. Pearl Harbour. Oil & World Domination.

  14. Matt says:

    Kevin,Thanks for your no nonsense detective work. The fact of US Consular employee Shayna Steinger personally issuing visas to 12 of the 19 hijackers while stationed in Saudi Arabia is certainly a real headshaker.. Add this to all of the other anomalies and we have very serious issues that deserves to be re-opened and fully re-investigated to the ends of the earth. How we can let the greatest attack on America go unanswered and those responsible not held to account is in a word…, Un-American..

  15. Igor Voskressensky says:

    Do we have somewhere the VIDEOS of the early evacuation of the WTC-7 between 9-00 and 10-00 a.m. that day – the entrances and the exits? Was that avacation really massive?.. Or not so massive because of the foreknowlege of its “collapse”?

  16. Herschel says:

    The most heinous crime is telling the workers there is no danger, return to your offices. Plane impacts 80 stories high, yet enormous beams at street level cut at a perfect forty five degree angle.

  17. Charles Young says:

    The bigger the lie the easier it is to make it believable. There’s an Everest high mountain of evidence proving the Alice in Wonderland media hijacked story is pure Pulp Fiction. Watch Jeremy Rys’ 9/11 video in YouTube, listen to a friend of both Clintons, Karl Schwarz, again on YT, ‘9/11 is a non-partisan issue.’ He personally knows a few of the people involved in this 2nd Pearl Harbour Event often called for by well-known neo-conservatives. In october 2000, Nicholas Rockefeller told his good friend Aaron Russo, ‘in 11 months there’ll be an event…after which George W Bush will appear on TV to anounce to the traumatised american people the US military intervention in Afghanistan. His prediction was proved to be true. Unsurprisingly, the unquestioning majority has been duefully hoodwinked and led up the proverbial garden path. Small numbers of shepherds lead the flocks of billions of bleeting and grazing sheep and send the sheepdogs in to nip and bite them into submission if they dare stray out of line and challenge official ‘his’ story! As George Bush once roughly said, go shopping and let the powers that be do what’s considered to be necessary to continue US-led full-spectrum dominance. God bless America😁.

Leave a Reply to Fred Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s